Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/33
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorEverett, B.-
dc.contributor.authorGroeneveld, J.-
dc.contributor.authorFennessy, S.-
dc.contributor.authorDias, N.-
dc.contributor.authorFilipe, O.-
dc.contributor.authorZacarias, L.-
dc.contributor.authorIgulu, M.-
dc.contributor.authorKuguru, B.-
dc.contributor.authorKimani, E.-
dc.contributor.authorMunga, C.-
dc.contributor.authorRabarison, G.-
dc.contributor.authorRazafindrakoto, H.-
dc.contributor.authorYemane, D.-
dc.date.accessioned2018-09-10T19:05:51Z-
dc.date.available2018-09-10T19:05:51Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/33-
dc.description.abstractExpanding coastal fisheries into deeper waters is frequently tabled as an option to increase harvests from the sea in the Southwest Indian Ocean. In this region, only Mozambique and South Africa have established deep-water trawl fisheries for mixed crustaceans. To investigate the fishery potential of deep shelf waters over a broader geographical extent, four bottom trawl surveys were undertaken, in Madagascar, Mozambique, Tanzania and Kenya, respectively, in 2011–2012. Teleosts dominated catches in all surveys (59–74% of total catches) and depths. Crustaceans made up 15% of the catch in Mozambique and Madagascar, but only 6% in Kenya and Tanzania, where elasmobranchs (18%) and other invertebrates (11–15%) were more abundant. A generalized linear model was constructed to quantify the effects of country, depth and day/night on the abundance of four common crustacean species. Abundance of Haliporoides triarthrus and Metanephrops mozambicus declined from south (Madagascar, Mozambique) to north (Kenya, Tanzania), but Heterocarpus woodmasoni was more abundant in Madagascar, Tanzania and Kenya. Chaceon macphersoni and H. triarthrus abundance increased up to 600 m depth, whereas M. mozambicus and H. woodmasoni peaked shallower, at 350–500 m. Crustacean catch composition in Mozambique was strikingly similar to commercial landings in eastern South Africa, supporting a distinct sub-region for fisheries management, but differed markedly across the Mozambique Channel. Deep-water crustaceans were less abundant in Kenya and Tanzania, with limited commercial appeal. New deep-water trawl fisheries will have to contend with significant teleost bycatch.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherElsevieren_US
dc.subjectAbundance indexen_US
dc.subjectStandardized CPUEen_US
dc.subjectCrustaceansen_US
dc.subjectTeleostsen_US
dc.subjectCatch compositionen_US
dc.subjectbiomassen_US
dc.subjectFisheries managementen_US
dc.subjectShared resourcesen_US
dc.subjectTrawl surveysen_US
dc.titleComposition and abundance of deep-water crustaceans in the Southwest Indian Ocean: Enough to support trawl fisheries?en_US
dc.title.alternative, , , , , , ,en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Articles



Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.