Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1361
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorHodbod, J.-
dc.contributor.authorStevenson, E.-
dc.contributor.authorAkall, J.-
dc.contributor.authorAkuja, T.-
dc.contributor.authorAngelei, I.-
dc.contributor.authorBedasso, E.-
dc.contributor.authorBuffavand, L.-
dc.contributor.authorDerbyshire, S.-
dc.contributor.authorEulenberger, I.-
dc.contributor.authorGownaris, N.-
dc.contributor.authorKamski, B.-
dc.contributor.authorKurewa, A.-
dc.contributor.authorLokuruka, M.-
dc.contributor.authorMulugeta, M.-
dc.contributor.authorOkenwa, D.-
dc.contributor.authorRodgers, C.-
dc.contributor.authorTebbs, E.-
dc.date.accessioned2020-02-05T13:13:58Z-
dc.date.available2020-02-05T13:13:58Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.citationAmbio volume 48, pages1099–1115(2019en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/123456789/1361-
dc.description.abstractThis paper synthesizes current knowledge on the impacts of the Gibe III dam and associated large-scale commercial farming in the Omo-Turkana Basin, based on an expert elicitation coupled with a scoping review and the collective knowledge of an multidisciplinary network of researchers with active data-collection programs in the Basin. We use social-ecological systems and political ecology frameworks to assess the impacts of these interventions on hydrology and ecosystem services in the Basin, and cascading effects on livelihoods, patterns of migration, and conflict dynamics for the people of the region. A landscape-scale transformation is occurring in which commodities, rather than staple foods for local consumption, are becoming the main output of the region. Mitigation measures initiated by the Ethiopian government—notably resettlement schemes—are not adequately buffering affected communities from food insecurity following disruption to indigenous livelihood systems. Therefore, while benefits are accruing to labor migrants, the costs of development are currently borne primarily by the agro–pastoralist indigenous people of the region. We consider measures that might maximize benefits from the changes underway and mitigate their negative outcomes, such as controlled floods, irrigating fodder crops, food aid, and benefit sharing.en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherSpringeren_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesAmbio;volume 48, pages 1099–1115-
dc.subjectSocial-ecological changeen_US
dc.subjectOmo-Turkana basinen_US
dc.titleSocial-ecological change in the Omo-Turkana basin: A synthesis of current developmentsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
Appears in Collections:Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Hodbod2019_Article_Social-ecologicalChangeInTheOm.pdf2.12 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.